KGUN 9 On Your SideNewsLocal News

Actions

Jury: Border agent not guilty on one manslaughter count, protest ensues

Later hearing to determine whether jury hung
Posted: 12:43 PM, Nov 21, 2018
Updated: 2018-11-22 05:55:47Z
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter

A U.S. District Court Jury found a border agent not guilty of involuntary manslaughter Wednesday, leading to protest in front of the Tucson Federal Courthouse late Wednesday, Nov. 21.

The verdict came down in the noon hour in the retrial of Border Patrol Agent Lonnie Swartz, who was accused of killing a Mexican teen in a cross-border shooting.

The three-hour protest began around 4:30 p.m. and led to police shutting down the intersection at Granada Avenue and Congress Street due to traffic concerns. 

Per TPD, the protest was peaceful, had about a hundred participants and the department made no arrests.

Though the protestors were marching because the jury found Swartz not guilty of involuntary manslaughter, they did not come to a verdict on another count -- voluntary manslaughter -- and a status hearing Dec. 11 will determine whether or not a hung jury is declared.

Swartz was facing a retrial on voluntary or involuntary manslaughter for killing 16-year-old Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez.

Last Spring, a jury acquitted him of second-degree murder but could not decide on the manslaughter charges.

Before opening statements began, Swartz attorneys made a new request to move the trial out of Tucson.  They say Swartz can’t get a fair trial here and claimed protestors tried to influence potential jurors through demonstrations and placing small photos of the dead teen where the jurors would sit.

Judge Raner Collins denied the request saying he’s confident none of the jurors chosen actually saw the photos, then the judge warned the courtroom audience anyone trying to influence jurors will be going to jail.

In his opening statement, prosecutor Wallace Kliendienst told jurors five years ago Agent Swartz went to help other agents and Nogales police trying to keep smugglers from getting back over the border fence and escaping into Mexico.

People on the Mexican side were throwing rocks to interfere with the agents.  Prosecutors concede rocks can be dangerous but say in this case Swartz and other agents could have stayed safe without resorting to deadly force.  He claims Swartz was fed up after facing six or seven other rock attacks and vented his frustration by firing sixteen shots through the fence and killing Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez.

But defense attorney Sean Chapman says Border Patrol agents are trained that rocks are a deadly force with the power to kill or maim and that Border Patrol training says guns can be justified to stop rock throwers.  He says the teenager was not some innocent bystander, but someone who chose to join the dangerous business of drug smuggling and was assaulting federal agents as part of his work.

Previously:

Supreme Court ruling could affect Swartz trial

Prosecutors mull Swartz retrial

Prosecutors: Border agent had 'darkened heart' when he shot Mexican teen