An Arizona Court of Appeals ruling says an Arizona law providing for stiffer sentences for use of a dangerous instrument in an attack only applies to cases in which the victim is a human, not an animal.
The ruling Thursday agreed with a trial judge that the alleged beating of a dog with a metal rod doesn't qualify as a "dangerous offense" that could resulting in longer prison sentence if there's a conviction.
According to the ruling, the sentencing enhancement's wording indicates the Legislature intended to enhance punishment for dangerous offenses to protect human life and that means the law applies when a person attacks another person.
The ruling decided an appeal filed in a Maricopa County case of a man awaiting trial.
Ruling: Stiffer sentences law doesn't include animal victims
AZ law doesn't include animal victims
An Arizona Court of Appeals ruling says an Arizona law providing for stiffer sentences for use of a dangerous instrument in an attack only applies to cases in which the victim is a human, not an animal.
Posted
and last updated
Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
